Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 03:32:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5D7A6F7904E239005F3AEBA1E0D3BF715A4786ABE2452194714CB8C2C5F774D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - That not ALL the funds were earmarked for condoms is not helpful context. Readers are not interested in what you consider "likely". Unless you can present solid evidence to contradict the facts in their entirety, leave your speculations and nitpicking in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1884435472556122559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5D7A6F7904E239005F3AEBA1E0D3BF715A4786ABE2452194714CB8C2C5F774D
  • createdAtMillis - 1738121534929
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1884435472556122559E5D7A6F7904E239005F3AEBA1E0D3BF715A4786ABE2452194714CB8C2C5F774D