Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 15:48:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6EE478A6DB0616E053E4FE7DF4037C28B874E4F2A4B0B354BC8D317ECEE738B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - That not ALL the funds were earmarked for condoms is not helpful context. Readers are not interested in what you consider "likely". Unless you can present solid evidence to contradict the facts in their entirety, leave your speculations and nitpicking in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1884435472556122559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6EE478A6DB0616E053E4FE7DF4037C28B874E4F2A4B0B354BC8D317ECEE738B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1738165690720
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18844354725561225596EE478A6DB0616E053E4FE7DF4037C28B874E4F2A4B0B354BC8D317ECEE738B6