Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 12:13:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5005C8BEF841F2BFDB0C8FCE9D2E7E1D4E6057AB1F0C177A3E4245D76E295464
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - That not ALL the funds were earmarked for condoms is not helpful context. Readers are not interested in what you consider "likely". Unless you can present solid evidence to contradict the facts in their entirety, leave your speculations and nitpicking in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1884435472556122559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5005C8BEF841F2BFDB0C8FCE9D2E7E1D4E6057AB1F0C177A3E4245D76E295464
  • createdAtMillis - 1738152780194
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18844354725561225595005C8BEF841F2BFDB0C8FCE9D2E7E1D4E6057AB1F0C177A3E4245D76E295464