Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 10:32:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F2AAB50F0D593C9476911696D7CD2F06C3BC1A23AA6F2E672F6A234595FE1CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - That not ALL the funds were earmarked for condoms is not helpful context. Readers are not interested in what you consider "likely". Unless you can present solid evidence to contradict the facts in their entirety, leave your speculations and nitpicking in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1884435472556122559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F2AAB50F0D593C9476911696D7CD2F06C3BC1A23AA6F2E672F6A234595FE1CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1738146750711
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18844354725561225593F2AAB50F0D593C9476911696D7CD2F06C3BC1A23AA6F2E672F6A234595FE1CF