Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 05:12:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 060416C91257857B04038C0E6D0E0F006B5E37C6B7D3B2118D0E7681A6084591
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - That not ALL the funds were earmarked for condoms is not helpful context. Readers are not interested in what you consider "likely". Unless you can present solid evidence to contradict the facts in their entirety, leave your speculations and nitpicking in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1884435472556122559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 060416C91257857B04038C0E6D0E0F006B5E37C6B7D3B2118D0E7681A6084591
  • createdAtMillis - 1738127572111
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1884435472556122559060416C91257857B04038C0E6D0E0F006B5E37C6B7D3B2118D0E7681A6084591