Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-04 21:42:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C418636C051A6CEE0D32072E8970E15B56BB8B07157CE68A745C69EB3ECBB0EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Faux La CIA n'a pas reconnu l'origine humaine du COVID. Elle évalue simplement la thèse de la fuite de labo plus probable, mais avec une confiance FAIBLE, que l'origine naturelle, et continue d'évaluer cette 2nde thèse. Et fuite de labo ne veut PAS dire origine humaine. https://archive.is/Kh1Kg#selection-2395.0-2395.228 https://www.medecinesciences.org/fr/articles/medsci/full_html/2022/06/msc220021/msc220021.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1884399662674657691
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C418636C051A6CEE0D32072E8970E15B56BB8B07157CE68A745C69EB3ECBB0EA
createdAtMillis - 1738705361847
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 1
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1884399662674657691C418636C051A6CEE0D32072E8970E15B56BB8B07157CE68A745C69EB3ECBB0EA