Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 20:23:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0E4F4003B48B73EC21DE34E445D64CE2439361F5433B21081B240D1377E0C75
Participant Details

Original Note:

Faux La CIA n'a pas reconnu l'origine humaine du COVID. Elle évalue simplement la thèse de la fuite de labo plus probable, mais avec une confiance FAIBLE, que l'origine naturelle, et continue d'évaluer cette 2nde thèse. Et fuite de labo ne veut PAS dire origine humaine. https://archive.is/Kh1Kg#selection-2395.0-2395.228 https://www.medecinesciences.org/fr/articles/medsci/full_html/2022/06/msc220021/msc220021.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1884399662674657691
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C0E4F4003B48B73EC21DE34E445D64CE2439361F5433B21081B240D1377E0C75
createdAtMillis - 1738182184773
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1884399662674657691C0E4F4003B48B73EC21DE34E445D64CE2439361F5433B21081B240D1377E0C75