Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 09:56:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B466512E21D7B919AD502CE3B1B761280FA8C4B9CAB3D15F719E0123146F65E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Faux La CIA n'a pas reconnu l'origine humaine du COVID. Elle évalue simplement la thèse de la fuite de labo plus probable, mais avec une confiance FAIBLE, que l'origine naturelle, et continue d'évaluer cette 2nde thèse. Et fuite de labo ne veut PAS dire origine humaine. https://archive.is/Kh1Kg#selection-2395.0-2395.228 https://www.medecinesciences.org/fr/articles/medsci/full_html/2022/06/msc220021/msc220021.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1884399662674657691
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B466512E21D7B919AD502CE3B1B761280FA8C4B9CAB3D15F719E0123146F65E3
createdAtMillis - 1738144572144
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1884399662674657691B466512E21D7B919AD502CE3B1B761280FA8C4B9CAB3D15F719E0123146F65E3