Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 02:50:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A267D93B272EBD2FD953678AC1E89464716CFF7616E02BE6DEEA8588199D34C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Faux La CIA n'a pas reconnu l'origine humaine du COVID. Elle évalue simplement la thèse de la fuite de labo plus probable, mais avec une confiance FAIBLE, que l'origine naturelle, et continue d'évaluer cette 2nde thèse. Et fuite de labo ne veut PAS dire origine humaine. https://archive.is/Kh1Kg#selection-2395.0-2395.228 https://www.medecinesciences.org/fr/articles/medsci/full_html/2022/06/msc220021/msc220021.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1884399662674657691
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A267D93B272EBD2FD953678AC1E89464716CFF7616E02BE6DEEA8588199D34C9
createdAtMillis - 1738119055336
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1884399662674657691A267D93B272EBD2FD953678AC1E89464716CFF7616E02BE6DEEA8588199D34C9