Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 01:42:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8FD7AE30C6A1C521916670DB5CCB1F4C663B72153B149F031C983E1414A6530E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Faux La CIA n'a pas reconnu l'origine humaine du COVID. Elle évalue simplement la thèse de la fuite de labo plus probable, mais avec une confiance FAIBLE, que l'origine naturelle, et continue d'évaluer cette 2nde thèse. Et fuite de labo ne veut PAS dire origine humaine. https://archive.is/Kh1Kg#selection-2395.0-2395.228 https://www.medecinesciences.org/fr/articles/medsci/full_html/2022/06/msc220021/msc220021.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1884399662674657691
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 8FD7AE30C6A1C521916670DB5CCB1F4C663B72153B149F031C983E1414A6530E
createdAtMillis - 1738114941479
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18843996626746576918FD7AE30C6A1C521916670DB5CCB1F4C663B72153B149F031C983E1414A6530E