Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-08 06:52:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59DF15F4EAF0904DBE005C2B5A47900569DA44E5609C11F5D6247B250AAA79AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study suffers from many data collection & classification problems, a significant statistical analysis flaw, selection bias/confounding issues, causal inference problems, data quality/transparency issues and research design flaws. https://theunbiasedscipod.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-failure-why-this-latest

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883844243426292170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59DF15F4EAF0904DBE005C2B5A47900569DA44E5609C11F5D6247B250AAA79AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1738997542667
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188384424342629217059DF15F4EAF0904DBE005C2B5A47900569DA44E5609C11F5D6247B250AAA79AE