Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-28 10:42:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. As the proposed CN’s own source makes clear, “copying word for word” *is* classic plagiarism, even if the facts relayed by those words is commonly known. See also the first entry here: https://nscc.libguides.com/c.php?g=292492&p=1947823

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883648157873029395
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1738060967952
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188364815787302939598F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8