Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-26 19:26:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C23666773E21CFDD209102E6BCDE9D0B884D308A42915C5BAD0139E351CCD5A2
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. This is a personal anecdote 2. There was not a specific bill the user would've been charged with 3. Other notes assume insurance would deem the entire process to procedure fully covered to make their statement applicable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883522014700331223
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C23666773E21CFDD209102E6BCDE9D0B884D308A42915C5BAD0139E351CCD5A2
  • createdAtMillis - 1737919564053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1883522014700331223C23666773E21CFDD209102E6BCDE9D0B884D308A42915C5BAD0139E351CCD5A2