Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-27 00:22:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C012ED0CB2EEAB00E1473B0C602FE999667961E32FB418EBE1424EF81EFBA54D
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. This is a personal anecdote 2. There was not a specific bill the user would've been charged with 3. Other notes assume insurance would deem the entire process to procedure fully covered to make their statement applicable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883522014700331223
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C012ED0CB2EEAB00E1473B0C602FE999667961E32FB418EBE1424EF81EFBA54D
  • createdAtMillis - 1737937346511
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1883522014700331223C012ED0CB2EEAB00E1473B0C602FE999667961E32FB418EBE1424EF81EFBA54D