Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-26 13:15:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3828225BEE428D73C5638DD10784DC67F8073C4F7068CEA03123E1055574A46E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note confuses the quality of the evidence with the stated conclusion. Following the example provided in the same link, it would be consistent to write: “We assess with low confidence (quality of the evidence) that Covid 19 probably (conclusion) leaked from a lab.” https://medium.com/@chris.cooley/words-of-estimative-probability-an-analytical-language-reference-be84b8625628

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883461129432698881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3828225BEE428D73C5638DD10784DC67F8073C4F7068CEA03123E1055574A46E
  • createdAtMillis - 1737897323043
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18834611294326988813828225BEE428D73C5638DD10784DC67F8073C4F7068CEA03123E1055574A46E