Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-26 13:54:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1887D89E42E5DA525647A088C43106D18CA3E68D734776E5AE464E47F71C0E38
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rachel Reeves does not make this comparison to disabled people but mentions the sickness benefit as an example. She references a generally “overly high benefits bill”, but also that people that need help should get it. This post mischaracterises the interview. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/url-rachel-reeves-interview-labour-chancellor-b572jbcgd

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883434631225065823
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1887D89E42E5DA525647A088C43106D18CA3E68D734776E5AE464E47F71C0E38
  • createdAtMillis - 1737899699292
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18834346312250658231887D89E42E5DA525647A088C43106D18CA3E68D734776E5AE464E47F71C0E38