Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-26 18:43:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF4B4ED428B6D5895EF9F981E4EE0FAC0364E6E50E23B4DE310AAC9451E16ED2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Context: The agency made its new assessment with “low confidence,” which means the intelligence behind it is fragmentary and incomplete. A CIA spokeswoman said the other theory remains plausible and they will continue to evaluate any credible new intelligence. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/25/us/politics/cia-covid-lab-leak.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883306538741166330
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF4B4ED428B6D5895EF9F981E4EE0FAC0364E6E50E23B4DE310AAC9451E16ED2
  • createdAtMillis - 1737917001953
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1883306538741166330EF4B4ED428B6D5895EF9F981E4EE0FAC0364E6E50E23B4DE310AAC9451E16ED2