Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-26 02:43:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A884FCB8904B2F7B53458B0CF7830D1F43F0D7A6E44A400B313C776AD833B182
Participant Details

Original Note:

C’est inexact, ce n’est qu’une hypothèse, il n’y a aucun élément prouvant que le virus provienne de fuites du laboratoire. Un porte-parole de l’agence a déclaré que l’autre théorie restait plausible. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/25/us/politics/cia-covid-lab-leak.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883252609886134416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A884FCB8904B2F7B53458B0CF7830D1F43F0D7A6E44A400B313C776AD833B182
  • createdAtMillis - 1737859423062
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1883252609886134416A884FCB8904B2F7B53458B0CF7830D1F43F0D7A6E44A400B313C776AD833B182