Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-26 07:34:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E03678B9283D9126C861DB3D60FC066E33DEBDB7DD52C1B8DAE0E154EB1671C
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that the person was a police officer and no evidence of any due diligence to confirm. This cannot be confirmed as "true". There is no evidence that the priority was to "manage the public's response" - the press releases were governed by sub judice rules. https://www.counterterrorism.police.uk/statements-from-merseyside-ctp-lancashire-child-safeguarding/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883238987277676685
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E03678B9283D9126C861DB3D60FC066E33DEBDB7DD52C1B8DAE0E154EB1671C
  • createdAtMillis - 1737876869957
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18832389872776766859E03678B9283D9126C861DB3D60FC066E33DEBDB7DD52C1B8DAE0E154EB1671C