Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-26 14:09:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Two of the links above presented as evidence do not include evidence. The retraction gives zero explanation of what methodology issues existed, just states that they exist and are a problem. This is an assertion with no evidence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883230786989752769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1737900573450
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1883230786989752769F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE