Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-25 11:04:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 836F1629C0901D0E78A180FC50908122F234AFBD341DE0CEE8467EDC839E55D2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note is valid- it implies it’s within his second term. Context within the headline could simply stop the implication. But they didn’t so the community note is. https://t.co/xSuBJuUlPk

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1883066412001907188
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 836F1629C0901D0E78A180FC50908122F234AFBD341DE0CEE8467EDC839E55D2
  • createdAtMillis - 1737803092398
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1883066412001907188836F1629C0901D0E78A180FC50908122F234AFBD341DE0CEE8467EDC839E55D2