Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-25 04:04:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF57CBDDD550199332F822E645D46A8BCCD198B3FC62BAA907A52907E3598D5C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed community uses a text, which may or may not be true and doesn’t add context- post that in the comments if you’d like. Also, the article states that it was NOT immediately clear why the flights were rejected, meaning the text is only speculation. https://t.co/zeWvaEFGul

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1882993960697962637
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF57CBDDD550199332F822E645D46A8BCCD198B3FC62BAA907A52907E3598D5C
  • createdAtMillis - 1737777856936
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1882993960697962637BF57CBDDD550199332F822E645D46A8BCCD198B3FC62BAA907A52907E3598D5C