Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-25 12:24:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 647EBADBF594F87203846009ABE8AF5AAD1EDCC2E7452882D2A1A8D342F85A36
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed community uses a text, which may or may not be true and doesn’t add context- post that in the comments if you’d like. Also, the article states that it was NOT immediately clear why the flights were rejected, meaning the text is only speculation. https://t.co/zeWvaEFGul

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1882993960697962637
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 647EBADBF594F87203846009ABE8AF5AAD1EDCC2E7452882D2A1A8D342F85A36
  • createdAtMillis - 1737807890875
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1882993960697962637647EBADBF594F87203846009ABE8AF5AAD1EDCC2E7452882D2A1A8D342F85A36