Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-25 06:11:15 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AEF4628E9624AEB8ACBD37B10248F48777122A9A5EC0861B5F9699D6C14E3C09
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - L'intervenant exprime son opinion d'historien. Comme d'autres pourraient le faire. Aucune des notes ne remet en cause factuellement son propos. Les notes contiennent essentiellement des attaques personnelles sans lien avec le caractère factuel ou non de son analyse.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1882779722779898179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AEF4628E9624AEB8ACBD37B10248F48777122A9A5EC0861B5F9699D6C14E3C09
  • createdAtMillis - 1737785475627
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1882779722779898179AEF4628E9624AEB8ACBD37B10248F48777122A9A5EC0861B5F9699D6C14E3C09