Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-25 09:19:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E843BB3A324C49880F64372C9A7621DCD9A74D5136A6FA5715367577B313885B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN. Non seulement les critiques de la note sont réels, mais en plus, la note ne mentionne pas les pires problèmes. Par exemple, le fait que l'étude ne prend que 4 différentes études, dont 2 en europe uniquement, et qu'un bon nombre d'autres étides ont été "oubliées". https://x.com/AnthonyDamys/status/1666836475097358337

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1882726119142731853
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E843BB3A324C49880F64372C9A7621DCD9A74D5136A6FA5715367577B313885B
createdAtMillis - 1737796783754
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1882726119142731853E843BB3A324C49880F64372C9A7621DCD9A74D5136A6FA5715367577B313885B