Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-23 17:52:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C99446C1EB495A22D57EEF59E6FE345AE36A3F9BED706919A98C283798D6118C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The frame of the painting, a 17th Century antique, was damaged, with damage valued at £8,000. The defendants could not be sure the screen would protect the painting, so intent was established. Holland was convicted of criminal damage, therefore not a political prisoner. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/HOLLAND.SENTREMS.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1882382439147811224
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C99446C1EB495A22D57EEF59E6FE345AE36A3F9BED706919A98C283798D6118C
  • createdAtMillis - 1737654725209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1882382439147811224C99446C1EB495A22D57EEF59E6FE345AE36A3F9BED706919A98C283798D6118C