Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-22 19:49:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 288C8D3054A83468546B3D0A56045DE4C72A5D9A5239AE6F5A1462C97FCAAB1B
Participant Details

Original Note:

User is presenting a complete misinterpretation. The judge called Ulbricht “privileged” because he attempted to argue that selling drugs constituted a “harm reduction” service that helped people. The judge labeled this a “privileged” perspective due to the harm drugs do. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/05/ulbricht-at-sentencing-i-respect-the-law-and-its-authority/ https://www.wired.com/2015/05/ahead-sentencing-ulbricht-defense-argues-silk-road-made-drug-use-safer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1882081810680537102
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 288C8D3054A83468546B3D0A56045DE4C72A5D9A5239AE6F5A1462C97FCAAB1B
  • createdAtMillis - 1737575345652
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1882081810680537102288C8D3054A83468546B3D0A56045DE4C72A5D9A5239AE6F5A1462C97FCAAB1B