Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-23 02:44:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CF9126F03C3C6685C72568AA727692552F6FF69CA8A82C23022CC4D69B138E15
Participant Details

Original Note:

百条委員会での調査に基づいた調査報告書として、叱責などの行為をパワハラと認定する方向である旨を報道しており、増山議員の個人的なポストは当該報道を補足、裏付けおよび客観的に反駁し得るものではありません。 https://www.mbs.jp/news/kansainews/20250122/GE00063130.shtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1882035548526940265
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CF9126F03C3C6685C72568AA727692552F6FF69CA8A82C23022CC4D69B138E15
  • createdAtMillis - 1737600284645
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1882035548526940265CF9126F03C3C6685C72568AA727692552F6FF69CA8A82C23022CC4D69B138E15