Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-22 19:32:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9C1CD40E691FDE84270216D56071D2F3A45410DF3F85BF7A5C6275EF5A1D6A30
Participant Details

Original Note:

The wide range does not include the Royal College of Psychatrists who were specifically excluded from giving their opinion to the committee. They have made comments that need to be heard & debated. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2024/11/29/rcpsych-comments-on-vote-for-assisted-dying-bill-in-england-and-wales

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1882025435615440984
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9C1CD40E691FDE84270216D56071D2F3A45410DF3F85BF7A5C6275EF5A1D6A30
createdAtMillis - 1737574350151
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18820254356154409849C1CD40E691FDE84270216D56071D2F3A45410DF3F85BF7A5C6275EF5A1D6A30