Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-29 08:38:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6400E8AD7B6FA9EEFC035C9A4D2F1A07F8885D9C4513A89C7E83B2381DE309DF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The wide range does not include the Royal College of Psychatrists who were specifically excluded from giving their opinion to the committee. They have made comments that need to be heard & debated. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2024/11/29/rcpsych-comments-on-vote-for-assisted-dying-bill-in-england-and-wales

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1882025435615440984
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 6400E8AD7B6FA9EEFC035C9A4D2F1A07F8885D9C4513A89C7E83B2381DE309DF
createdAtMillis - 1738139928391
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18820254356154409846400E8AD7B6FA9EEFC035C9A4D2F1A07F8885D9C4513A89C7E83B2381DE309DF