Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-22 14:13:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57D200CCB5973800C1CCEB81EB4BB33E68B104335CF3BD56CA5495A497688DC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The wide range does not include the Royal College of Psychatrists who were specifically excluded from giving their opinion to the committee. They have made comments that need to be heard & debated. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2024/11/29/rcpsych-comments-on-vote-for-assisted-dying-bill-in-england-and-wales

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1882025435615440984
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 57D200CCB5973800C1CCEB81EB4BB33E68B104335CF3BD56CA5495A497688DC2
createdAtMillis - 1737555187501
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 188202543561544098457D200CCB5973800C1CCEB81EB4BB33E68B104335CF3BD56CA5495A497688DC2