Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-22 18:25:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578
Participant Details

Original Note:

The wide range does not include the Royal College of Psychatrists who were specifically excluded from giving their opinion to the committee. They have made comments that need to be heard & debated. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2024/11/29/rcpsych-comments-on-vote-for-assisted-dying-bill-in-england-and-wales

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1882025435615440984
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 30B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578
createdAtMillis - 1737570357178
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 188202543561544098430B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578