Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-22 17:42:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 134538534E512C39A74EC76C370EEA533C0D083313BB2ED7CA9F14CB42132E67
Participant Details

Original Note:

The wide range does not include the Royal College of Psychatrists who were specifically excluded from giving their opinion to the committee. They have made comments that need to be heard & debated. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2024/11/29/rcpsych-comments-on-vote-for-assisted-dying-bill-in-england-and-wales

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1882025435615440984
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 134538534E512C39A74EC76C370EEA533C0D083313BB2ED7CA9F14CB42132E67
createdAtMillis - 1737567773015
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1882025435615440984134538534E512C39A74EC76C370EEA533C0D083313BB2ED7CA9F14CB42132E67