Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-22 00:39:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B6343955F373B8096B4EBBFA11CD592514558300BF5B2FC644E39D8D7E6020F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not included in the post, the ex wife in question is on the record denying the claims made. This adds very important context to this. https://www.axios.com/2025/01/21/danielle-hegseth-affidavit?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=editorial

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881861577185595507
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B6343955F373B8096B4EBBFA11CD592514558300BF5B2FC644E39D8D7E6020F
  • createdAtMillis - 1737506392434
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18818615771855955071B6343955F373B8096B4EBBFA11CD592514558300BF5B2FC644E39D8D7E6020F