Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-22 17:39:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CA3C50A9E455AFCF4C0A983F2502CB62C36EB1BFC27B964DCBB59F62D36ED24
Participant Details

Original Note:

Peter intentionally did not include the statement of the actual ex wife who directly denied the story. She is the only original first person source with knowledge. https://www.axios.com/2025/01/21/danielle-hegseth-affidavit

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881856338503811140
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CA3C50A9E455AFCF4C0A983F2502CB62C36EB1BFC27B964DCBB59F62D36ED24
  • createdAtMillis - 1737567583291
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18818563385038111404CA3C50A9E455AFCF4C0A983F2502CB62C36EB1BFC27B964DCBB59F62D36ED24