Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-21 13:30:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F154668CCCFF6FE383A24D2E8D29B599019394250A36C834D34C823D50B67678
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was no cover-up. It is Contempt of Court to report or publish information relating to the defendant’s past that could jeopardise an ongoing investigation or trial. It is completely normal for details such as these to be withheld until after a verdict. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/contempt-court

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881659703471829262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F154668CCCFF6FE383A24D2E8D29B599019394250A36C834D34C823D50B67678
  • createdAtMillis - 1737466243061
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1881659703471829262F154668CCCFF6FE383A24D2E8D29B599019394250A36C834D34C823D50B67678