Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-21 15:52:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD250578F1DA8E57056B6DA11292BCC72A9A93646EE05547CB38B9C9F407991A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was no cover-up. It is Contempt of Court to report or publish information relating to the defendant’s past that could jeopardise an ongoing investigation or trial. It is completely normal for details such as these to be withheld until after a verdict. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/contempt-court

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881659703471829262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD250578F1DA8E57056B6DA11292BCC72A9A93646EE05547CB38B9C9F407991A
  • createdAtMillis - 1737474761746
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1881659703471829262DD250578F1DA8E57056B6DA11292BCC72A9A93646EE05547CB38B9C9F407991A