Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-21 11:48:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D02EB690D2C9099A8C8FC2AB913A12B22BD0CB0475BF14C815122C46C9310EB1
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was no cover-up. It is Contempt of Court to report or publish information relating to the defendant’s past that could jeopardise an ongoing investigation or trial. It is completely normal for details such as these to be withheld until after a verdict. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/contempt-court

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881659703471829262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D02EB690D2C9099A8C8FC2AB913A12B22BD0CB0475BF14C815122C46C9310EB1
  • createdAtMillis - 1737460138425
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1881659703471829262D02EB690D2C9099A8C8FC2AB913A12B22BD0CB0475BF14C815122C46C9310EB1