Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-21 12:33:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7FC2622A16AD25FF167B8F2F36F93841FA1E45372339C5EDEF84FA8432D47765
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was no cover-up. It is Contempt of Court to report or publish information relating to the defendant’s past that could jeopardise an ongoing investigation or trial. It is completely normal for details such as these to be withheld until after a verdict. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/contempt-court

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881659703471829262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7FC2622A16AD25FF167B8F2F36F93841FA1E45372339C5EDEF84FA8432D47765
  • createdAtMillis - 1737462780278
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18816597034718292627FC2622A16AD25FF167B8F2F36F93841FA1E45372339C5EDEF84FA8432D47765