Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-22 08:04:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48FE0F47F803050F4B176402BAAA25B8A2B931063A7853AE0A23F11EEF246D6E
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was no cover-up. It is Contempt of Court to report or publish information relating to the defendant’s past that could jeopardise an ongoing investigation or trial. It is completely normal for details such as these to be withheld until after a verdict. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/contempt-court

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881659703471829262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48FE0F47F803050F4B176402BAAA25B8A2B931063A7853AE0A23F11EEF246D6E
  • createdAtMillis - 1737533066125
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188165970347182926248FE0F47F803050F4B176402BAAA25B8A2B931063A7853AE0A23F11EEF246D6E