Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-21 11:17:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7174542E0FF2FFCE884ADB9530E521ABB3CCF5C36A92C8E5B7BD7AAE78874EBD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es handelt sich dabei um keine Zahlen von INSA, sondern um eine eigene Berechnung, die mit seriƶser Meinungsforschung nichts zu tun hat. Sagt der Verfasser des Tweets selber. https://x.com/kritiker2024/status/1881418815621521640?s=46&t=5vmkgJTZ_erKC7IdaaC_OQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881641877000057128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7174542E0FF2FFCE884ADB9530E521ABB3CCF5C36A92C8E5B7BD7AAE78874EBD
  • createdAtMillis - 1737458263669
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18816418770000571287174542E0FF2FFCE884ADB9530E521ABB3CCF5C36A92C8E5B7BD7AAE78874EBD