Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-21 10:07:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6A09AC50E915C19024D76D233184FAEA50EC8B580816A3DC15A43D9D7D514E0F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The linked Guardian article clearly states “ On each occasion it was decided that while the behaviour might be concerning it did not meet the threshold for intervention by Prevent.” The proposed CN is incorrect. Based on the article we know why no action was taken. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jan/20/axel-rudakubana-was-referred-to-counter-extremism-scheme-three-times
All Note Details