Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-21 01:08:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 621A16456951795BA7973EDB39CD004E0DA3181CC2536A46E4D9E8B49C5CE239
Participant Details
Original Note:
The linked Guardian article clearly states “ On each occasion it was decided that while the behaviour might be concerning it did not meet the threshold for intervention by Prevent.” The proposed CN is incorrect. Based on the article we know why no action was taken. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jan/20/axel-rudakubana-was-referred-to-counter-extremism-scheme-three-times
All Note Details