Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-20 18:53:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3A8B826EA8C5DAE5C5E8A3FD5CA8965CF0A41CCA426403EEB621D8E666CD5DF
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/236/79/ The Supreme Court ruled that while a pardon may contain “an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it.” A crime does not necessarily have to take place for a pardon to be given and accepted, nor has any evidence appeared to charge him with a specific crime

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881391368326750264
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3A8B826EA8C5DAE5C5E8A3FD5CA8965CF0A41CCA426403EEB621D8E666CD5DF
  • createdAtMillis - 1737399231163
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1881391368326750264E3A8B826EA8C5DAE5C5E8A3FD5CA8965CF0A41CCA426403EEB621D8E666CD5DF