Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-20 14:15:24 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F8CBDEB84D5D3117BFCC9A78EB89A2AB2038E8F58B33759B10F02CEC3456FB37
Participant Details
Original Note:
Contrary to the OP Supreme Court precedent states that issuing a pardon to a person who has not been charged with a crime implies they committed a crime and accepting that pardon is an implied admission of guilt. Burdick v United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915) https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/usrep236079.pdf
All Note Details