Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-20 13:55:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5162A5B7E2D3AE3D0C3ADE3B1A261522DC7A8D54D2A014FA5C373C56E57CE14
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to the OP Supreme Court precedent states that issuing a pardon to a person who has not been charged with a crime implies they committed a crime and accepting that pardon is an implied admission of guilt. Burdick v United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915) https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/usrep236079.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881336916479443104
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5162A5B7E2D3AE3D0C3ADE3B1A261522DC7A8D54D2A014FA5C373C56E57CE14
  • createdAtMillis - 1737381316449
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1881336916479443104F5162A5B7E2D3AE3D0C3ADE3B1A261522DC7A8D54D2A014FA5C373C56E57CE14