Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-20 14:08:29 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E371394002CFF6B268BD8048DE4D3DC5D3BB698F702503BBEF6E01E5815E023A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Contrary to the OP Supreme Court precedent states that issuing a pardon to a person who has not been charged with a crime implies they committed a crime and accepting that pardon is an implied admission of guilt. Burdick v United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915) https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/usrep236079.pdf
All Note Details