Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-21 01:46:36 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D3A40323B9C93EA1D15EE52393ED7A85D07E91207EBBD6393C3A121A53596147
Participant Details
Original Note:
Contrary to the OP Supreme Court precedent states that issuing a pardon to a person who has not been charged with a crime implies they committed a crime and accepting that pardon is an implied admission of guilt. Burdick v United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915) https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/usrep236079.pdf
All Note Details