Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-20 13:51:43 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C3AEACBEB2A54C5A29A1978A3505D449EE459E1F4CBC45E702D012138A815767
Participant Details
Original Note:
Contrary to the OP Supreme Court precedent states that issuing a pardon to a person who has not been charged with a crime implies they committed a crime and accepting that pardon is an implied admission of guilt. Burdick v United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915) https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/usrep236079.pdf
All Note Details