Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-20 15:39:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B68774DB19F720D52DA76CF1B7AA18652DEA809FC67A842418B42D99B1441314
Participant Details
Original Note:
Contrary to the OP Supreme Court precedent states that issuing a pardon to a person who has not been charged with a crime implies they committed a crime and accepting that pardon is an implied admission of guilt. Burdick v United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915) https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/usrep236079.pdf
All Note Details